Filial Duty

Filial Duty, Chapter 15: The Question of Remonstrance

Serving under the Emperor demands the highest standard of loyalty, wisdom, and self-discipline.

Translation

CHAPTER XV

THE QUESTION OF REMONSTRANCE IN CONNECTION WITH FILIAL DUTY

Tsêng Tzŭ said: “I have heard all that you said about parental love,

filial love, reverence to elders, how to treat parents every day, and

how to please them by making oneself known for good conduct; and now

I will venture to ask you whether it is filial that a son should obey

every command of his father, whether right or wrong?”

“What do you say?—what do you say?” replied Confucius. “Once upon a

time there was a certain Emperor who would have lost his empire through

his wickedness, but that he had seven good ministers who often checked

his illegal actions by strong protests; there was also a feudal baron

who would have lost his feudal estate through wantonness, but for the

fact that he had five good men who often made strong remonstrances to

him; and there was also a statesman who would have brought frightful

calamity upon his family, but for the fact that he had three good

servants who often strongly advised him not to do what he ought not.

“If a man has a good friend to resist him in doing bad actions, he will

have his reputation preserved; so if a father has a son to resist his

wrong commands, he will be saved from committing serious faults.

“When the command is wrong, a son should resist his father, and a

minister should resist his August Master.

“The maxim is, ‘Resist when wrongly commanded.’ Hence how can he be

called filial who obeys his father when he is commanded to do wrong?”

Practical Reading

Serving under the Emperor demands the highest standard of loyalty, wisdom, and self-discipline. The chapter makes clear that greater responsibility requires greater character.

The modern question: as your sphere of influence grows, are you growing with it? Skills can be learned at any stage, but character requires ongoing attention. The text suggests that those who serve at the highest levels must be willing to be examined—not only by others but by their own growing self-knowledge.